Role of cinema in promoting gender equity to achieve sustainable development goals in India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future. Gender Equity means end of all forms of discrimination and violence against all women and girls, must have equal rights and opportunity, and be able to live life of free of violence and discrimination. Women's equality and empowerment is not only one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, but is also integral to all dimensions of inclusive and sustainable development. This paper evaluates the role of cinema in promoting gender equity through modern day films. Content analysis of films like Queen, Kahaani, Raazi, Mom, Hichki, Marykom, NH10, Manikarnika, Pink is done. These films have women as protagonist and heroes. It helps in removing the stereotype that only men can be a hero and women are supposed to stand behind them for support, protection, security and safety of themselves and their family. This study deals with the changing role of women in the society from a home maker to a super woman. It can be seen in history that films with female leads have made the women realize that they are not weak and can fight for themselves. Gender discrimination is a reality in Indian Society. Achieving gender equality and women empowerment is integral to each of the 17 goals. Only by ensuring the rights of women and girls, justice and inclusion, economies that work for all, and sustaining our shared environment now and for future generations. Gender equality is not only a fundamental human right, but a necessary foundation for a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".