Experimental Study on Cast-In-Situ Masonry Cavity Walls Subjected to In-Plane Cyclic Loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the behavior of cast-in-situ masonry cavity walls subjected to in-plane quasi-static loading. Thirteen cast-in-situ masonry cavity walls and one solid wall were tested under combined axial and quasi-static lateral loads. Test parameters included the tie shape, tie layout, thickness of the insulating layer, and the level of axial compression. The problems related to shear capacity and failure mechanisms of cast-in-situ masonry cavity walls were analyzed. Experimental results indicate that failure of most wall specimens occurred via crushing at corners, accompanied by flexural and diagonal cracks in the inner leaves. The shape and layout of the ties had a limited effect on the shear strength of cast-in-situ masonry cavity walls, while axial compression had a positive influence on shear strength. The relative displacement between the inner and outer leaves was nearly zero before walls cracked and reached less than 2 mm at the ultimate load. The shape and layout of the ties had a slight influence on the coordination of inner and outer leaves, while the insulating layer thickness and axial compression had a negative effect. Hysteretic loops under quasi-static loading were spindle-like, and wall specimens exhibited large nonlinear deformation capacity, indicating adequate aseismic capability. A new formula for calculating the shear capacity of the cast-in-situ cavity masonry walls was proposed and was demonstrated to be accurate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".