MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999150847 · doi:10.1142/s0219887820500383

Lorentz symmetry breaking in supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics

2020· article· en· W2999150847 on OpenAlex
Prince A. Ganai, Owais Ahmad, Javier Perez Tobia, Alexander Gillard, Vedaant Vyas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSuperspaceSupersymmetryGauge theorySupersymmetric gauge theoryLorentz transformationSupersymmetry breakingGauge fixingTheoretical physicsIntroduction to gauge theoryQuantum field theoryMathematical physicsQuantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanicsGauge boson

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lorentz symmetry is one of the fundamental symmetries of nature; however, it can be broken by several proposals such as quantum gravity effects, low energy approximations in string theory and dark matter. In this paper, Lorentz symmetry is broken in supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics using aether superspace formalism without breaking any supersymmetry. To break the Lorentz symmetry in three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, we must use the [Formula: see text] aether superspace. A new constant vector field is introduced and used to deform the deformed generator of supersymmetry. This formalism is required to fix the unphysical degrees of freedom that arise from the quantum gauge transformation required to quantize this theory. By using Yokoyama’s gaugeon formalism, it is possible to study these gaugeon transformations. As a result of the quantum gauge transformation, the supersymmetric algebra gets modified and the theory is invariant under BRST symmetry. These results could aid in the construction of the Gravity’s Rainbow theory and in the study of superconformal field theory. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that different gauges in this deformed supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics can be related to each other using the gaugeon formalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it