Lorentz symmetry breaking in supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lorentz symmetry is one of the fundamental symmetries of nature; however, it can be broken by several proposals such as quantum gravity effects, low energy approximations in string theory and dark matter. In this paper, Lorentz symmetry is broken in supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics using aether superspace formalism without breaking any supersymmetry. To break the Lorentz symmetry in three-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, we must use the [Formula: see text] aether superspace. A new constant vector field is introduced and used to deform the deformed generator of supersymmetry. This formalism is required to fix the unphysical degrees of freedom that arise from the quantum gauge transformation required to quantize this theory. By using Yokoyama’s gaugeon formalism, it is possible to study these gaugeon transformations. As a result of the quantum gauge transformation, the supersymmetric algebra gets modified and the theory is invariant under BRST symmetry. These results could aid in the construction of the Gravity’s Rainbow theory and in the study of superconformal field theory. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that different gauges in this deformed supersymmetric quantum electrodynamics can be related to each other using the gaugeon formalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".