Stable, Dual Redox Unit Organic Electrodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of organic materials for electrochemical energy storage has attracted great attention because of their high natural abundance and relatively low toxicity. The bulk of these studies focus on small molecules, polymers, or porous/framework-type materials that employ one type of redox moiety. Here, we report the synthesis and testing of organic materials that incorporate two distinct types of redox units: triptycene-based quinones and perylene diimides. We examine this "dual redox" concept through the synthesis of both frameworks and small molecule model compounds with the redox units positioned at the vertices and connection points. Such a design increases the theoretical capacity of the material. It also imparts high stability because both examples are relatively rigid and highly insoluble in the electrolyte. Lithium-ion batteries consisting of the framework and the small molecule have an excellent cycling retention of 75 and 77%, respectively, over 500 cycles at 1 C. Our work emphasizes the advantages of using multiple redox units in the design of the cathodic materials and redox-active triptycene linkages to achieve high cycling stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".