Smooth and Flexible Dual Optimal Inequalities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We address the problem of accelerating column generation (CG) for set-covering formulations via dual optimal inequalities (DOIs). We study two novel classes of DOIs, which are referred to as Flexible DOIs (F-DOIs) and Smooth-DOIs (S-DOIs), respectively (and jointly as SF-DOIs). F-DOIs provide rebates for covering items more than necessary. S-DOIs describe the payment of a penalty to permit the undercoverage of items in exchange for the overinclusion of other items. Unlike other classes of DOIs from the literature, the S-DOIs and F-DOIs rely on very little problem-specific knowledge and, as such, have the potential to be applied to a vast number of problem domains. In particular, we discuss the application of the new DOIs to three relevant problems: the single-source capacitated facility location problem, the capacitated p-median problem, and the capacitated vehicle-routing problem. We provide computational evidence of the strength of the new inequalities by embedding them within a column-generation solver for these problems. Substantial speedups can be observed as when compared with a nonstabilized variant of the same CG procedure to achieve the linear-relaxation lower bound on problems with dense columns and structured assignment costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".