Muscle sympathetic reactivity to apneic and exercise stress in high-altitude Sherpa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lowland-dwelling populations exhibit persistent sympathetic hyperactivity at altitude that alters vascular function. High-altitude populations, such as Sherpa, have previously exhibited greater peripheral blood flow in response to acute stress than Lowlanders, which may be explained through lower sympathetic activity. Our purpose was to determine whether Sherpa exhibit lower sympathetic reactivity to stress than Lowlanders. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) was measured at rest in Lowlanders ( n = 14; age = 27 ± 6 yr) at 344 m and between 1 and 10 days at 5,050 m. Sherpa (age = 32 ± 11 yr) were tested at 5,050 m ( n = 8). Neurovascular reactivity (i.e., change in MSNA patterns) was measured during maximal end-expiratory apnea, isometric hand grip (IHG; 30% maximal voluntary contraction for 2-min), and postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO; 3 min). Burst frequency (bursts/min) and incidence (bursts/100 heartbeats) and total normalized SNA (arbitrary units/min) were analyzed at rest, immediately before apnea breakpoint, and during the last minute of IHG and PECO. Vascular responses to apnea, IHG, and PECO were also measured. MSNA reactivity to apnea was smaller in Sherpa than Lowlanders at 5,050 m, although blood pressure responses were similar between groups. MSNA increases in Lowlanders during apnea at 5,050 m were significantly lower than at 344 m ( P < 0.05), indicating that a possible sympathetic ceiling was reached in Lowlanders at 5,050 m. MSNA increased similarly during IHG and PECO in Lowlanders at both 334 m and 5,050 m and in Sherpa at 5,050 m, while vascular changes (mean brachial arterial pressure, contralateral brachial flow and resistance) were similar between groups. Sherpa demonstrate overall lower sympathetic reactivity that may be a result of heightened vascular responsiveness to potential apneic stress at altitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".