Discriminative Multi-View Privileged Information Learning for Image Re-Ranking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conventional multi-view re-ranking methods usually perform asymmetrical matching between the region of interest (ROI) in the query image and the whole target image for similarity computation. Due to the inconsistency in the visual appearance, this practice tends to degrade the retrieval accuracy particularly when the image ROI, which is usually interpreted as the image objectness, accounts for a smaller region in the image. Since Privileged Information (PI), which can be viewed as the image prior, is able to characterize well the image objectness, we are aiming at leveraging PI for further improving the performance of multi-view re-ranking in this paper. Towards this end, we propose a discriminative multi-view re-ranking approach in which both the original global image visual contents and the local auxiliary PI features are simultaneously integrated into a unified training framework for generating the latent subspaces with sufficient discriminating power. For the on-the-fly re-ranking, since the multi-view PI features are unavailable, we only project the original multi-view image representations onto the latent subspace, and thus the re-ranking can be achieved by computing and sorting the distances from the multi-view embeddings to the separating hyperplane. Extensive experimental evaluations on the two public benchmarks, Oxford5k and Paris6k, reveal that our approach provides further performance boost for accurate image re-ranking, whilst the comparative study demonstrates the advantage of our method against other multi-view re-ranking methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".