Effects of Different Bridges of A Series of c-Donor-nc-Bridge-cf- Acceptor Type Block Copolymers for Potential Solar Cell Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of c-D-nc-B-cf-A (or DBpfA, p=0,1,2,4,6) type of block copolymers has been designed, synthesized, and systematically studied for photo induced charge separations; where c-D is an electron-donating conjugated block, nc-B is a non-conjugated bridge unit, and cf-A is an electron-accepting conjugated and fluorinated block. A series of photoluminescence quenching measurements with and without different bridge units were evaluated for DBpfA. This study highlights the chemical molecular bridge effects on the optoelectronic property of the DBpfA type block copolymer. Specifically, the DB1fA block copolymer (where only one methylene unit is present in the bridge unit) appears exhibiting the best optoelectronic performance. DfA block copolymer (without any bridge unit) exhibits photoluminescence quenching and optoelectronic property that is between the shortest and longest bridge units, and this can be explained by the calculated four stable state twisting angles (most stable state is at a seventeen degree twist) between conjugated donor and conjugated acceptor blocks. The optoelectronic properties appear following the PL quenching nicely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".