A Nonparametric Bayesian Network Model for Predicting Corrosion Depth on Buried Pipelines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study develops a nonparametric Bayesian network (NPBN) model to predict the corrosion depth on buried pipelines using the pipeline age and local soil properties. The dependence structure and parameters of the NPBN model are extracted from Velázquez’s dataset, which consists of 250 samples of corrosion depths, pipeline age, and such local soil properties as the water content, redox potential, and pH value. The NPBN models the joint distribution of the corrosion depth, pipeline age, and local soil parameters by a Gaussian copula. The five-fold cross-validation is used to examine the predictive capability of the developed NPBN model. The results indicate that the predicted mean values of corrosion depths in general agree well with the corresponding field measurements, and more than 95% of the field-measured depths are within the 5 to 95 percentile range of the predicted distribution for the corrosion depth. The NPBN and the associated model mining method provide an effective data-driven approach to develop predictive models of corrosion depths using soil parameters as predictors. The developed NPBN will benefit the corrosion management of pipelines for which direct inspections are infeasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it