Intramolecular mode coupling of the isotopomers of water: a non-scalar charge density-derived perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O/HDO isotopomers of water are presented in terms that enable bond-flexing, bond-twist and bond-anharmonicity to be quantified during the bending (Q1), symmetric-stretch (Q2) and anti-symmetric-stretch (Q3) normal modes of vibration. Bond-flexing was detected by the presence of curved bonding and the bond-anharmonicity was detected by the presence of motion of the bond critical point (BCP) relative to the oxygen atom. These 2-D scalar measures are unable to fully describe the 3-D nature of the normal modes of vibration and therefore any susceptibility towards normal mode coupling, or to fully distinguish the three isotopomers. To detect bond-twist a vector-based measure was used, in the form of the bond critical point (BCP) trajectory, constructed in terms of preferred directions of electronic motion, defined by the variation of the position of the BCP during the normal modes of vibration. The BCP trajectories describe the coupling of the intramolecular bending and symmetric-stretch normal modes as well as distinguishing all three isotopomers within the harmonic approximation. The coupling of the bending and symmetric-stretch normal modes are suggested to be facilitated by the absence of bond-twist that would disrupt the coupling between Sigma O-H bonds and hydrogen-bonding. Partial coupling was found for the mixed isotopomer HDO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".