MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hippocampal subfield measurement and ILAE hippocampal sclerosis subtype classification with in vivo 4.7 tesla MRI

2020· article· en· W2999748087 on OpenAlexafffund
Trevor A. Steve, Justine Gargula, Ehsan Misaghi, Tomasz A. Nowacki, Laura Schmitt, B. Matt Wheatley, Donald Gross

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsy Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHippocampal formationHippocampal sclerosisEpilepsyNeuroscienceMultiple sclerosisMedicineIn vivoPsychologyBiologyTemporal lobePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Neuropathological studies indicate that hippocampal sclerosis (HS) consists of three subtypes (ILAE types 1-3 HS). However, HS subtypes currently can only be diagnosed by pathological analysis of hippocampal tissue resected during epilepsy surgery or at autopsy. In vivo diagnosis of HS subtypes holds potential to improve our understanding of these variants in the ipsilateral as well as contralateral hippocampus. In this study, we aimed to: i) evaluate the reliability of our histology-derived segmentation protocol when applied to in vivo MRI; and ii) characterize variability of HS subtypes along the hippocampal long axis in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Eleven subjects with unilateral HS were compared with ten healthy controls. We used 4.7 T MRI to acquire high resolution MR Images of the hippocampus in each subject. In vivo MRI-based diagnoses of HS subtypes were then determined in each patient by two methods: i) hippocampal subfield volumetry of the entire hippocampal body; and ii) subfield area analysis at multiple thin slices throughout the hippocampal body. RESULTS: Hippocampal body subfield segmentation demonstrated excellent reliability and volumetry of the symptomatic hippocampus revealed abnormalities in all eleven patients. Six subjects demonstrated findings consistent with type 1 HS while five subjects had volumetry-defined atypical HS (two with type 2 HS & three with type 3 HS) in the symptomatic hippocampus, while five subjects were found to have type 3 HS in the contralateral hippocampus. Subfield area analyses demonstrated remarkable variability of HS subtypes along the hippocampal long axis, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the seizure focus. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results provide preliminary evidence that determining HS Subtype using in vivo MRI may allow preoperative diagnosis of ILAE HS subtypes. Further studies are essential to determine the pathological correlates of these neuroimaging findings. The heterogeneity of abnormalities observed along the long axis of the hippocampus is consistent with previous autopsy studies and highlights the necessity of studying the entire hippocampus both ipsilateral and contralateral to the seizure focus in these future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsy ResearchSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207