MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999760596

Doğum Merkezleri: Kanada İzlenimleri

2019· article· tr· W2999760596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Songül Aktaş, Hafize Öztürk Can

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bu derlemede amac,Kanada’da akademik amacli ziyaret edilen iki farkli dogum birimine yonelik elde edilen bilgi ve izlenimleri  paylasmaktir. Kanada dogum merkezi izlenimleri, Uluslararasi Ebelik Konfederasyonunun duzenledigi 31. Dunya Ebelik Kongresi kapsaminda gidilen ve 15-29 Haziran 2017 tarihleri arasinda yapilan bireysel ve akademik ziyaretlerle elde edilmistir. Dogum yapilan iki merkezin gozlenme firsati olmustur. Izlenimler ve ziyaret icin her iki kurumdan onay alinmistir. Bu merkezler; Toronto Dogum Merkezi ve McGill Universitesi Hastanesi Dogum Merkezidir. Toronto Dogum Merkezi: Bu m erkezde sadece ebeler calismaktadir. Ozellikle riski olmayan, ebeyle dogurmayi isteyen gebeler bu dogum merkezine basvurmaktadir. Merkezde Kanada’nin ilk yerli halki olan Aborjinlerin kulturunden esinlenerek “kulture duyarli, dogum surecine kadin/aileyi merkeze alan” bir ebelik bakim modeli uygulanmaktadir. Tek kisilik odalarda; genis bir yatak, banyo/tuvalet, su havuzu v.b. ve bebek kortu bulunmaktadir. Odalarda rahatlatici duygu uyandiran renkler kullanilmaktadir. Anne adayi, dogum eylemi basladiktan taburcu olana kadar ayni odada kalabilmektedir. Odalarda yerden sabit monteli askiliklar bulunmaktadir. Dogumda agriyla basetmede, hidroterapi sik kullanilmaktadir. Bu merkezde isteyen ailelere tutsu, muzik, dua gibi dogum soleni yapabilecegi olanak sunulmaktadir. Vajinal dogumdan 3-4 saat sonra anneler hastaneden taburcu edilmektedir.  McGill Universitesi Hastanesi Dogum Merkezi : Bu merkez, Montreal’de McGilluniversitesi hastane binasinin icinde bulunan bir kliniktir. Dogum kliniginde ebeler calismayip, dogum hekimleriyle  hemsireler calismaktadir. Hemsireler, dogum esnasinda hekime yardimci olmaktadir. Universite hastanesinin bu dogum biriminin iki ana unitesi ve bir laktasyon danismanligi odasi bulunmaktadir. Bunlardan biri dogum eylemi icin,digeri yuksek riskli gebeler ile dogum sonrasi anneler icindir. Klinikte uc tane obstetriktriyaj odasi bulunmaktadir. Yenidoganda risk gelismesi durumunda, annelerin kalabilecegi ozel bir oda bulunmaktadir. Dogum eyleminde kadinlara farkli seceneklerin sunulmasi acisindan, farkli bir kultur ve ulke olarak ulkemizdeki dogum hizmetlerini guclendirmede bu izlenimler onemlidir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207