MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epidemiology of invasive ocular surface squamous neoplasia in Canada during 1992–2010

2020· article· en· W2999795694 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rami Darwich, Feras M. Ghazawi, Michelle Le, Elham Rahme, Nebras Alghazawi, Andrei Zubarev, Linda Moreau, Denis Sasseville, Miguel N. Burnier, Ivan V. Litvinov

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Ophthalmology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreOttawa HospitalMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Dermatology Foundation
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)EpidemiologyMalignancyCancer registryConjunctivaPopulationDemographyCancerDermatologyOphthalmologyPathologyInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) is the most common non-pigmented ocular surface malignancy. It is classified as invasive OSNN (IOSSN) when the underlying stroma are infiltrated by dysplastic squamous epithelial cells through the basement membrane. Here, we present the descriptive epidemiology and geographical distribution of IOSSN in Canada. METHODS: We determined the incidence and geographical distribution of IOSSN cases diagnosed between 1992 and 2010 using two independent population-based cancer registries: the Canadian Cancer Registry and Le Registre Québécois du Cancer. RESULTS: The mean annual age-standardised incidence rate (WHO 2000-2025) of IOSSN for 1992-2010 was 0.45 cases per million individuals per year with an average annual percent increase in incidence of 4.5%. IOSSN localisation to the conjunctiva was documented in at least 57% of the reported cases. IOSSN exhibited a male predilection ratio of 3.3:1.0 with a mean age at diagnosis of 69 years. Incidence rates of IOSSN across Canadian provinces and cities showed no significant differences from the crude national average. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, particularly concerning IOSSN patient age and male predilection, corroborate with data reported from the USA. Additional studies are needed to determine whether the observed increase in incidence rate over the study period (1992-2010) is significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of OphthalmologySame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207