P375 Feasibility of the first paediatric randomised controlled pilot trial of faecal microbiota transplant for ulcerative colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The first multicentre paediatric randomised-controlled trial (RCT) of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in ulcerative colitis (UC) was recently completed in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. The use of FMT in paediatric UC treatment has been limited to small, open-label case series. Unique clinical and patient factors necessitated a paediatric-specific pilot RCT. Our aim was to assess key feasibility measures of conducting an FMT trial in paediatric patients to inform design, and feasibility of larger, future multicentre studies. Methods Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive rectal enemas 2×/week for 6 weeks, followed by a 6-month follow-up period. Enemas contained normal saline (placebo), or RBX2660 (Rebiotix; Roseville, USA), a faecal microbiota preparation of stool from healthy adult donors (active). Patients were eligible for the open-label extension following completion or withdrawal from the placebo arm. Study feasibility was assessed through patient eligibility, recruitment, completion of sample collections, adverse events, and hospitalisations. Results Over 36 months across two tertiary IBD clinics, 48 paediatric patients were screened for participation. 75.0% (36) met eligibility criteria for enrolment and 69.4% (25) participated in the randomised trial. 53.8% (7) of patients randomised to the placebo arm entered the open-label arm. We stratified completion of sample collections by intervention (Weeks 0–6), and follow-up phases of the trial (Weeks 6–30). 75.3% of required bloodwork was obtained during both phases; patient-provided stool samples declined from 76.0% (intervention) to 45% (follow-up). 83.0% (10) reported adverse events in the active arm, and 38.4% (5) in placebo; these were all minor and self-limited (muscle pain, cough, fatigue, etc.). No patients experienced adverse events related to enemas. Five patients experienced serious adverse events: IBD flare (2 active, 1 placebo), and reactivation of C. difficile infection (2 active) (Table 1). Conclusion In this first paediatric RCT of FMT for UC, we established important feasibility data regarding the design of FMT trials in children. Patient acceptance of FMT was high, and well-tolerated with minor, self-limited adverse events, and few serious adverse events. Return-rates of stool samples were low during follow-up; strategies to improve uptake are needed, particularly given the value of microbiome data for analyses. Overall, our study demonstrates strong interest and tolerance among paediatric patients for FMT-based trials. Future studies will build upon our protocol to enhance clinical data on the effects of microbiota-based therapeutics in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".