MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2999974722 · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57045-y

Morphological and radiative characteristics of soot aggregates: Experimental and numerical research

2020· article· en· W2999974722 on OpenAlexaff
Ezgi Sutcu, Nimeti Döner, Fengshan Liu, Ümran Erçetin, Fatih Şen, Jérôme Yon, José Morán, Andrés Fuentes

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersDumlupinar Üniversitesi
KeywordsSootRadiative transferAbsorbanceWavelengthScanning electron microscopeMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Discrete dipole approximationOpticsChemistryPhysicsScatteringCombustionChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The study is aimed at investigating the radiative properties of soot aggregates at determined morphological features using both experimental and numerical methods. Soot aggregates collected from air monitoring stations in different locations were examined. The locations were divided into three groups. The first group (Case 1) included the coastal and industrial zone; the second group (Case 2) consisted of small and large cities; and the third group (Case 3) included areas in the neighbourhood of thermal power plants. The absorbance measurements of the soot aggregates were conducted in the visible and near-infrared spectra, and in the wavelength range of 2 μm-20 μm. The samples were characterised by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and their radiative properties were assessed using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) for numerically generated fractal aggregates with two popular refractive indices of m = 1.60 + 0.60i and m = 1.90 + 0.75i. Calculations were conducted for primary particles in point-contact, with 20% overlapping and with a coating (50% and 80%) in the wavelength range of 0.4–1.064 μm. The largest measured absorbance values in both the winter and summer seasons were found in the cities in Case 1, and the x-ray diffraction (XRD) phases of the samples were also presented. The radiative properties of the aggregates, i.e., Df = 1.78 and kf = 2.0 representing Case 3, were close to those of aggregates with Df = 2.1 and kf = 2.35 representing Case 1 in the investigated wavelength range. The calculated radiative properties and the experimental absorbance measurements for point-contact and overlapping situations showed the same trend in the examined wavelengths. The absorbance properties of the samples of coastal and industrial zones were distinctively higher than others in the wavelength range of 2 μm-20 μm which could be attributed to the PAH effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→