MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999994609 · doi:10.3390/lubricants8010009

Characterization of Lubricated Friction Behavior of Thermal Spray Steel Coatings in Comparison with Grey Cast Iron

2020· article· en· W2999994609 on OpenAlex
Ming Lou, A.T. Alpas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLubricants · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHoningMaterials scienceReciprocating motionTribometerCast ironLubricantLubricationSurface roughnessThermal sprayingComposite materialMetallurgyTribologyCoatingMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work examines friction properties of smooth-honed thermal spray (TS) low carbon steel coatings produced on an Al-9.0% Si alloy using a plasma transferred wire arc (PTWA) method and an AISI 1010 wire used as feedstock in comparison with the ASM type D grey cast iron (CI) samples subjected to the same (smooth) honing process. CI samples prepared using a standard honing process were also tested for comparison. Reciprocating sliding tests were performed using a Cameron–Plint tribometer against CrN-coated counterfaces within a speed range of 0.06–1.20 m/s covering the boundary and mixed lubrication conditions. Stribeck curves were constructed to show the coefficient of friction (COF) variations with the ratio (λ) of lubricant film thickness to composite surface roughness of TS and CI samples at the mid-stroke position where sliding speeds and surface roughnesses were measured. Examination of the Stribeck curves showed that the TS coated surfaces provided lower COF values compared to CI surfaces given the same smooth honing treatment, e.g., for λ = 2.7 a COF of 0.029 was observed for TS and 0.035 for CI, whereas conventional honing of CI provided a COF of 0.047 under the same condition. Metallographic evidence was given for the surface features and formation of tribolayers on the contact surfaces. The arithmetic mean heights of the surfaces, Sa measured after the tests remained similar for the smooth-honed TS and CI samples. The low COF values of the TS samples were discussed in terms of the surface pores generated during their manufacturing process, and the high oil retention depth ratio (Svk/Sk) of the TS coated surfaces due to the presence of these pores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it