MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000127880 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.516

P387 Real-world clinical outcomes of biologic-naïve non-complicated Crohn’s disease patients treated with vedolizumab: Results from the EVOLVE study

2020· article· en· W3000127880 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrés Yarur, Gerasimos J. Mantzaris, Uri Kopylov, M Bassel, Neil R. Brett, H Kim, Claudia Lopez, Sumit Saha, Christina Kifnidi, Christian Agboton, Shashi Adsul, Dirk Demuth, Michelle Luo, Shu Wang, Brian Bressler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalTakeda (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseCohortRetrospective cohort studyMedical recordDiseaseClinical trialSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Crohn’s disease (CD) can lead to complications that impact treatment (Tx) decisions and its clinical effectiveness. The objective of this analysis was to compare clinical effectiveness outcomes of CD patients treated with first-line biologic vedolizumab (VDZ) who did not have a complicated disease phenotype (non-complicated) to VDZ patients who had complications (complex disease). Methods This was a retrospective real-world cohort study of biologic-naïve CD patients (≥18 years old) in Canada, Greece and the USA who initiated VDZ Tx between May 2014 and March 2018. Data were collected from Tx initiation to the earliest of chart abstraction date or death. The non-complicated CD was defined as patients who had mild or moderate disease severity and no active fistula at Tx initiation, had no prior CD-related surgeries since diagnosis and no CD-related hospitalisations within 12 months prior to Tx initiation. The complex disease cohort encompassed all other CD patients. Cumulative rates of clinical effectiveness outcomes over 24 months (Tx persistence, clinical response and clinical remission) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Using pre-defined hierarchical algorithms, clinical response and clinical remission were assessed from standard disease measures reported in the medical records. Results This analysis included 218 CD patients treated with VDZ (non-complicated: 64 (29.3%); complex: 154 (70.6%) from 37 sites. Mean (SD) age at Tx initiation: non-complicated, 46.2 (15.8); complex, 54.0 (16.7); male: non-complicated, 45.3%; complex, 55.2%. Cumulative rates of clinical response were significantly greater in non-complicated than complex disease patients over 24 months (non-complicated: 93.0%, complex: 76.0%, p < 0.01) (Figure 1). Tx persistence (non-complicated: 76.7%, complex: 66.6%, p = 0.68) (Figure 2) and clinical remission (non-complicated: 81.9%, complex: 73.5%, p = 0.36) (Figure 1) were not significantly different between the two cohorts over 24 months. Fewer patients had data for mucosal healing over 24 months, and it was also not significantly different between groups at 12 months (non-complicated: 66.4%, complex: 60.2%, p = 0.95). Conclusion A high proportion of patients (70%) had a complex disease when VDZ Tx was initiated but those with non-complicated phenotype had a higher response rate. To help guide physicians in positioning the optimal Tx for biologic-naïve CD patients, it is important to identify the sub-group of patients who can most benefit from VDZ Tx. The results of this real-world study suggest that the biologic-naïve, non-complicated CD patients benefit more from VDZ treatment compared with those with disease complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207