MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000137114 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jez319.320

P636 A unique case of purulent pericarditis resulting in cardiac tamponade

2020· article· en· W3000137114 on OpenAlexaff
Hammad Shah, Vincent Kent Le

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePericardiocentesisCardiac tamponadeParasternal linePericardial effusionChillsPneumothoraxBlood pressureTransthoracic echocardiogramVentriclePleural effusionSurgeryPericardial fluidCardiologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction and case report description A 54-year-old male with no past cardiac disease was experiencing a productive cough, fevers, chills, and shortness of breath for 3 days in the community. His dyspnea worsened significantly, and he then presented to the emergency room. He admitted to using intravenous recreational drugs. His initial vital signs included a temperature of 38.2 degrees Celsius, a heart rate of 116 beats per minute, and a blood pressure of 88/42 mmHg. He had a positive pulses paradoxus with a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 14 mmHg on inspiration. Description of the problem and procedures This presentation was consistent with cardiac tamponade. He had an emergent echocardiogram showing a large pericardial effusion in the apical-four-chamber view (Image 1, A), including collapse of the right ventricle during diastole (Image 1, B, Green Arrow). There were also fibrin strands seen in a modified parasternal long axis view (Image 1, C, Blue Arrow). He had an emergency pericardiocentesis using real-time ultrasound guidance, which drained 400 mL of thick brown purulent fluid. A pigtail catheter was inserted to allow for continued drainage. Immediately afterwards, the patient’s blood pressure normalized, and his shortness of breath improved significantly. Using the ultrasound, the physician also saw bilateral pleural effusions. The larger left pleural effusion was drained, and a pigtail catheter was inserted into the left pleural space. After confirming that there was no post-procedure left pneumothorax, the right pleural effusion was also drained. An echocardiogram after the pericardiocentesis showed a significant decrease in the size of the pericardial effusion (Image 1, D). The patient was started on broad-spectrum antibiotics, which was then narrowed after cultures from both the pericardial fluid and pleural fluid grew methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Discussion Cardiac tamponade results in increased compression of the cardiac chambers due to raised pericardial pressures. As it progresses, it can result in significant impairment in venous return, cardiac output, and blood pressure. This is a life-threatening condition if it is not promptly treated. In this case, the patient had a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus empyema which spread contiguously into the pericardium and resulted in cardiac tamponade. Conclusions and implications for clinical practice This case highlights the clinical benefits of being proficient in performing a point-of-care ultrasound because a bedside echocardiogram by the physician immediately confirmed the diagnosis and allowed for safer drainage of the pericardial effusion using ultrasound guidance to decrease the chance of causing a perforation of the ventricle. Using ultrasound, the clinician was also able to promptly diagnose the pleural effusions and urgently drain them, which was necessary for achieving source control in order to fully treat the infection. Abstract P636 Figure. Image 1. Cardiac Tamponade

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicPericarditis and Cardiac TamponadeFrench-language works237,207