Regulation in unimodal international conventions on land and air transport of exonerating cases of carrier liability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prior to joining the European Union, the trend of domestic transport under the legal regime enshrined in the uniform rules was anticipated by the special regulation in the field of air transport where, taking the model of the French legislator (Article L. 321-3 of the French Civil Aviation Code ), by art. 3 of Law no. 355/3003 established the rule according to which the liability of the Romanian air carrier, whether operating on domestic or international routes, as well as a foreign air carrier that operates flights on routes originating and destined on Romanian territory was established by the provisions of the Convention Montreal. After Romania became a member of the European Union, the law no. 355/2003 was repealed as a consequence of the incidence of Regulation (EC) No Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 of 9 October 1997 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents and Regulation (EC) No 785/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on insurance requirements for air carriers and aircraft operators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.042 | 0.050 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".