Bibliographic record
Abstract
A tissue hammock is part of the life habits of the population of the North and Northeast of Brazil. In these regions, and is the formula for sending, and thus, it becomes an opportunity to carry out various activities. Cerebral Palsy (CP), a flexible structure of the hammock can cause postural instability, limiting its independence to perform activities in the immediate position, increasing its own capacity for upper limbs. In this sense, an adapted hammock was created and created, resulting from adjustments in the tissue hammock and insertion of a seat and backrest system with a rigid base for positioning in the classroom, besides favoring the alignment of trunk and control to carry out activities, such as the scope manual. The objective of this research is to verify the characteristics of the trunk and lower limb alignment during seat positioning and in the task of reaching the hammock adapted to the bank and to the hammock without adaptation, with the CP, comparing with its control pairs without neurological deficiency, as well as the level of parental satisfaction. Quasi experimental clinical trial, comparative statistical, with CP group (GCP) and Control Group (CG). The selection of the non-probabilistic clinical sample, composed by person aged between 5 and 16 years old. The GCP is composed of person with bilateral spastic CPs, level II and III according to a Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), while the GC, by control neurological semantic control, matched in relation to age, weight, height and width make hip. Participants were sent in three different conditions: in the adapted hammock, seat and net without seat / backrest support. Through the kinematic analysis, the trunk alignment in the posture sent without movements - static task - was evaluated through the analysis of the ankle, knee, hip, pelvis and trunk angles. In the scope task, spatial-temporal variables of the movement were analyzed: time, hand trajectory; the displacement of the acromion, an average labor force, the retirement rate and deactivation of the movement, in addition to the initial and final angles of the shoulder and elbow. In the static task, the results indicated the similarity of the lower limbs, pelvis and trunk angles in the three sitting conditions, inferring that an adapted hammock may be an option to sit for short periods of time. The results of the task and the range motion protocol in the GCP and GC, evidencing less control of the movement for GCP, besides the use of the inclination of the trunk forward to realize the reach. Parents, through the Quebec B-Quest satisfaction questionnaire, were satisfied with the dimensions of the product, however, pointed out the need for improvements in comfort and safety. It is concluded that an adapted hammock can be considered as a short-time sending option, since it promoted postural control in CP, and that it does not influence reach accomplishment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".