MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000246910 · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b05112

Evaluation of Absorption and Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Tyrosol Acyl Esters in Rats

2020· article· en· W3000246910 on OpenAlexaff
Fawen Yin, Xinmiao Wang, Yuanyuan Hu, Hongkai Xie, Xiaoyang Liu, Lei Qin, Jianghua Zhang, Dayong Zhou, Fereidoon Shahidi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTyrosolBioavailabilityPharmacokineticsChemistryAbsorption (acoustics)In vivoMetabolismOral administrationGlucuronideHydrolysisBiochemistryChromatographyPharmacologyBiologyPhenols

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipophenols are regarded as an emerging source of functional food ingredients. However, little is known about their in vivo digestion, absorption, and metabolism. Thus, the pharmacokinetic characteristics in rat and the gut microbial degradation of tyrosol acyl esters (TYr-Es) with fatty acids of C12:0, C18:0, and C18:2 were investigated for the first time. Major metabolites including tyrosol sulfate and tyrosol glucuronide, rather than the parent compounds, were detected in rat plasma after oral administration of TYr-Es. The increased plasma half-life (T1/2) and mean residence time demonstrated that TYr-Es display a longer duration of action in vivo than TYr, potentially leading to higher oral bioavailability. TYr-Es could be hydrolyzed by the gut microbiota to free TYr, which may result in the appearance of the second absorption peak in pharmacokinetic profiles. Therefore, TYr-Es exhibit improved bioavailability compared to that of TYr because of their prolonged duration of action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207