MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Snow Cover Changes

2018· other· en· W3000274995 on OpenAlexaff
Ross Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Encyclopedia of Geography · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowpackSnowEnvironmental scienceAlbedo (alchemy)Snow lineSnow fieldNorthern HemispherePrecipitationClimatologyArcticLatitudeSnowmeltCryosphereClimate changePhysical geographyAtmospheric sciencesSnow coverGeographySea iceGeologyMeteorologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seasonal snow covers a large fraction of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) land area (and some Southern Hemisphere mountain regions) for periods of up to 10 months of the year and is an integral part of the landscape, climate, hydrology, ecology, and economy. A snow cover (duration, depth) and its physical properties (albedo, density, crystal structure, etc.) represent an integrated response of physical processes to a number of external climate/environmental drivers. Greenhouse gas‐induced warming and moistening of mid‐ to high latitudes, increased incoming longwave radiation, and Arctic green‐up are all drivers of a changing snow cover, and there is growing evidence from surface and satellite observations of significant changes in seasonal snow cover: significant declines in spring snow cover duration are observed across the NH, and significant decreases in winter snowpack are observed over mid‐latitudes, particularly coastal mountains. Trends in snow cover simulated by climate models are for the most part consistent with observations but underestimate the observed rates of decrease in Arctic spring snow cover. Climate models have improved but important sources of uncertainty remain related to snow albedo feedbacks, high‐latitude precipitation, and inadequate treatment of landscape‐dependent snow processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Encyclopedia of GeographySame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207