MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000451323 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2019-0338

Methiin as a nematode attractant in <i>Allium sativum</i>

2020· article· en· W3000451323 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noboru Takada, Sayaka Sutoh, M Toyota, Yoshihisa Yamazaki, Nozomi Kitano-Yamashita, Chisato Ushida, Kazuo Yamashita

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Science and Technology AgencyHirosaki University
KeywordsAllium sativumNematodeBulbSativumChemistryPyrethrumBotanyHorticultureFood sciencePesticideBiologyAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Damage to garlic (Allium sativum L.) caused by nematodes (Ditylenchus destructor Thorne) is becoming a serious agricultural hazard, leading to a great loss in garlic production. Once the garlic bulbs are invaded, the pathogenic nematode drastically increases in number along with the rotting of bulbs. It was therefore conceived that nematode attractants are present in the bulbs. Based on this hypothesis, chemical investigations were performed to explore a nematode attractant in A. sativum bulbs, which resulted in the identification of methiin (S-methyl-l-cysteine S-oxide) as an attractant. Bioassay and quantification experiments of methiin in extracts of A. sativum bulb led to the conclusion that methiin possesses sufficient potential to attract D. destructor into A. sativum bulbs. Moreover, an activity comparing study of methiin with its analogs showed that the sulfoxide functionality is essential for attractant activity. Moreover, methiin was revealed to attract Caenorhabditis elegans. Further investigation of methiin will help to elucidate the neuronal system of D. destructor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207