P587 Adalimumab in pediatric Crohn’s disease: A long-term multi-centre real-world experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background There is a paucity of data regarding long-term outcomes for adalimumab (ADA) in pediatric Crohn’s disease (CD). We describe the long-term effectiveness of ADA, in achieving clinical and biochemical remission in a Canadian multi-centre pediatric CD cohort. Moreover, we report the effects of prior anti-TNF exposure and use of a concomitant immunomodulator (IM) on durability of clinical and biochemical response. The primary outcome was 24-month corticosteroid (CS) free remission. Secondary objectives included biochemical and faecal calprotectin response over the study period. Methods Retrospective review of electronic records of all children aged 3–18 years with CD requiring ADA at 4 centres across Canada (Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Calgary) between January 2005 and December 2017. Results One hundred and nine children (68% male; median age 13.07 [IQR 10.6–15.1]) with CD (L1 21.7%, L2 28.3%, L3 50%) were included with a median follow-up of 15.9 months [IQR 7.6–24]. Seventy-four patients (67.9%) were anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) naïve. Concomitant IM therapy was used in 51 (46.8%). CS free clinical remission at 24 months was observed in 45/66 (68%). Over time, the median PCDAI, CRP, ESR and faecal calprotectin significantly improved (Table 1). During follow-up, 36 (33%) patients discontinued ADA; 6 (5.5%) had primary non-response, 28 (25.7%) had secondary LOR and 2 (1.8%) had intolerance. At 24 months, clinical remission was achieved more frequently in patients who were Anti-TNF naïve (81% vs. 43.5% p 0.002). There was no significant difference in biochemical or faecal calprotectin outcomes between those who were bio-naive or experienced. There was no significant difference in the time to loss of response between those on monotherapy and combination therapy with an IM and ADA (HR 0.64 [95% CI 0.33–1.26] p0.2). Conclusion This study demonstrates that ADA is effective and durable in pediatric CD. Over 24 months, clinical, biochemical and faecal calprotectin improvement was seen. In our cohort, clinical response to ADA was greater in anti-TNF naïve compared with anti-TNF experienced patients; however,, biochemical and faecal calprotectin outcomes did not differ. ADA response appears durable with no significant difference in patients on monotherapy or combination therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".