MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000567102 · doi:10.5080/u23743

Relationship of Alexithymia, Rumination and Coping Style with Psoriasis and Their Effects on The Clinical Features

2020· article· en· W3000567102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkish Journal of Psychiatry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaToronto Alexithymia ScaleRuminationFeelingPsoriasisCoping (psychology)Clinical psychologyPsychologyAnxietyDepression (economics)MedicinePsychiatryInternal medicineCognitionDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: A relationship has been demonstrated between stress and the increase in the skin plaques in psoriasis. In addition, psoriasis is observed in cases of severe alexithymia and stress. In depression and various psychiatric disorders, there is a relationship between rumination and both the onset and persistence of the disease. The role of rumination, being a stress related factor, was investigated in this study. METHOD: The study included 91 patients with psoriasis and 93 healthy controls. All participants were evaluated with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Coping Style Scale, the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Any increase in the plaque formation after the duration of 1 month was recorded by the clinician. RESULTS: In both the patient and the control groups, rumination scores were significantly correlated with the alexithymia severity scores (psoriasis group r=0.46, p<0.01; control group r=0.38, p<0.01) and the helpless coping styles scores (psoriasis group r=0.56, p<0.01; healthy r=0.57, p<0.01). When depression and anxiety scores were controlled, significant positive correlations were observed in the patient group between rumination scores and the scores on the difficulty of identifying feelings (r=0.42, p<0.01), the difficulty of describing feelings (r=0.25, p<0.05) and the scores on helpless coping styles (r=0.41, p<0.01); and also significant positive correlations were observed in the control group between the rumination scores and the scores on the difficulty of identifying feelings (r=0.27, p<0.05) and on helpless coping styles (r=0.42, p<0.01). Comparing the patients with and without increase in the plaques showed significant differences in the scores on rumination (p<0.01), difficulty of describing feelings (p <0.05) and total alexithymia scores (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The relationship of alexithymia and of passive stress coping styles with rumination may have an effect on the course of psoriasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it