MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000567102 · doi:10.5080/u23743

Relationship of Alexithymia, Rumination and Coping Style with Psoriasis and Their Effects on The Clinical Features

2020· article· en· W3000567102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sevim Baysak, Ebru Karagün, Erkan Baysak

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkish Journal of Psychiatry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaToronto Alexithymia ScaleRuminationFeelingPsoriasisCoping (psychology)Clinical psychologyPsychologyAnxietyDepression (economics)MedicinePsychiatryInternal medicineCognitionDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: A relationship has been demonstrated between stress and the increase in the skin plaques in psoriasis. In addition, psoriasis is observed in cases of severe alexithymia and stress. In depression and various psychiatric disorders, there is a relationship between rumination and both the onset and persistence of the disease. The role of rumination, being a stress related factor, was investigated in this study. METHOD: The study included 91 patients with psoriasis and 93 healthy controls. All participants were evaluated with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Coping Style Scale, the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Any increase in the plaque formation after the duration of 1 month was recorded by the clinician. RESULTS: In both the patient and the control groups, rumination scores were significantly correlated with the alexithymia severity scores (psoriasis group r=0.46, p<0.01; control group r=0.38, p<0.01) and the helpless coping styles scores (psoriasis group r=0.56, p<0.01; healthy r=0.57, p<0.01). When depression and anxiety scores were controlled, significant positive correlations were observed in the patient group between rumination scores and the scores on the difficulty of identifying feelings (r=0.42, p<0.01), the difficulty of describing feelings (r=0.25, p<0.05) and the scores on helpless coping styles (r=0.41, p<0.01); and also significant positive correlations were observed in the control group between the rumination scores and the scores on the difficulty of identifying feelings (r=0.27, p<0.05) and on helpless coping styles (r=0.42, p<0.01). Comparing the patients with and without increase in the plaques showed significant differences in the scores on rumination (p<0.01), difficulty of describing feelings (p <0.05) and total alexithymia scores (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The relationship of alexithymia and of passive stress coping styles with rumination may have an effect on the course of psoriasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTurkish Journal of PsychiatrySame topicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207