MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000670963 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.2964989

Initial Evaluation of the Performance of Novel Inorganic Scintillating Detectors for Small Animal Irradiation Dosimetry

2020· article· en· W3000670963 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Byrne, Majed Alharbi, Nolan Esplen, Peter Woulfe, Sinéad O’Keeffe, Magdalena Bazalova‐Carter, Mark Foley

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorDetectorReproducibilityRepeatabilityPhysicsDosimetryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsNuclear medicineChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to design and evaluate the performance of four novel inorganic scintillating detectors (ISDs) on the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP). Relative scintillator output, measurement repeatability, setup uncertainty, linearity with dose rate, and signal reproducibility over time were investigated. The Gd <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> O <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> S:Tb detector had the highest relative signal output, generating up to 219 times more charge than a previously characterized BCF-60-based plastic scintillating detector (PSD). The Gd <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> O <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> S:Tb detector was then used to measure 220 kVp therapy beam profiles of 10 x 10 and 5 x 5 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> fields. Beam profiles using the ZnS-based phosphor were also obtained and compared to investigate the performance of a lower density inorganic scintillator. 10 x 10 and 5 x 5 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> therapy beam profile measurements made with the Gd <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> O <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> S:Tb and BCF-60 detectors differed, on average, by 1.1% and 1.9%, respectively. The ZnS:Ag measurements differed, on average, by 2.5% and 6% relative to BCF-60 measurements of the 10 x 10 and 5 x 5 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> beam profiles, respectively. MicroCT imaging of the detector volumes was also performed, revealing poor packing of the ZnS:Ag crystalline phosphor in the deepest region of the cylindrical cavity. The Gd <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> O <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> S:Tb detector, in particular, has proven to be a promising candidate for real-time dosimetry of small fields in small animal irradiators, primarily because of the very large signal intensities observed, along with good repeatability, dose rate linearity, reproducibility and agreement with beam profile measurements made with a previously validated detector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207