MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000682766

Timing and controls on the delivery of coarse sediment to deltas and submarine fans on a formerly glaciated coast and shelf

2017· article· en· W3000682766 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexandre Normandeau, Pierre Dietrich, Patrick Lajeunesse, Guillaume St‐Onge, Jean‐François Ghienne, Mathieu J. Duchesne, Pierre Francus

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsCenter for Northern StudiesUniversité LavalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à RimouskiGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgradationGeologySubmarine canyonLongshore driftBathymetrySubmarineSedimentDeltaSedimentary budgetOceanographySea levelCanyonChannel (broadcasting)GeomorphologyContinental shelfAggradationContinental marginSediment transportSedimentary depositional environmentPaleontologyFluvialTectonicsStructural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of deltas and submarine fans is often envisioned as largely controlled by relative sea-level variations. However, in some cases, relative sea level can have less effect on delta and submarine fan activity than sediment supply and shelf geomorphology. In order to document the relative importance of these three factors on deltaic and submarine fan evolution in a formerly glaciated environment, this paper documents the delivery of coarse sediment to the Laurentian Channel (eastern Canada). The well-constrained stratigraphic and geomorphologic framework of both the glacio-isostatically uplifted deltas and the modern Laurentian Channel fans allows us to document and contrast the evolution of river-fed deltas, river-fed canyon/fan systems, and longshore drift–fed fans during deglacial and postglacial times. The evolution of these different types of fans can be divided into three phases. The first phase was characterized by delta progradation on the shelf while relative sea level was at its maximum, although already falling, and the ice margin gradually retreated inland. The second phase was characterized by the delivery of deltaic sediment in the deep realm of the Laurentian Channel, permitted by the supply of large amounts of glaciogenic sediments derived from the retreating ice margin and the lowering of the relative sea level. At the same time, sediment instability along the steep Laurentian Channel formed small incisions that evolved into submarine canyons where the narrow shelf allowed the trapping of longshore sediment. The third phase was characterized by the withdrawal of the ice margin from the watershed of the main rivers and the drastic decrease in sediment supply to the deltas. Consequently, the delta fronts experienced strong coastal erosion, even though relative sea level was still lowering in some cases, and the eroded sediments were transferred onto the shelf and to adjacent bays. This transfer of coastal sediments allowed the continued activity of longshore drift–fed canyons. The retreat of the ice margin from the watersheds thus controlled the supply of sediment and induced a change in delta type, passing from river-dominated to wave-dominated deltas. This paper highlights the role of the type of sediment supply (ice-contact, glaciofluvial, and longshore drift) in the timing and activity of submarine fans in high-latitude environments. A conceptual model is proposed for high-latitude shelves where sediment delivery to submarine fans is mostly controlled by structural inheritance (watershed area and shelf geomorphology) rather than relative sea-level fluctuations. Therefore, although relative sea level fell during delta progradation, this study demonstrates that it was not the main contributor to delta and submarine fan growth. This has wider implications for the extraction of sea-level information from stratigraphic successions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207