MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000685986 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.621

P492 Use of bowel ultrasound to assess disease activity in Crohn’s disease patients after induction therapy with infliximab

2020· article· en· W3000685986 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C Frias Gomes, Catarina Nascimento, Fábio Pereira, Ana Teresa Caldeira, R. Sousa, Cátia Arieira, Sofıa Xavier, Sara Monteiro, Francisca Dias de Castro, Sílvia Leite, Jorge Cotter, A. Santos, Marília Cravo, Joana Torres, Carolina Palmela

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabInternal medicineFaecal calprotectinCrohn's diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseGastroenterologyCohortDiseaseCalprotectinProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Objective goals are needed to guide patient management and assess treatment efficacy in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Bowel ultrasound (US) is a widely available, non-invasive and inexpensive technique increasingly being used in these patients. The use of bowel wall thickness (BWT) has been proved to be an accurate measure for assessing disease activity and response to therapy. Recent studies show a rapid improvement of BWT after 3-month of therapy. Our aim was to evaluate BWT variation after induction therapy with infliximab (IFX) in CD patients and correlate BWT with clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods Prospective cohort multicentre study including patients with active CD starting IFX therapy. Clinical disease activity was assessed using the Harvey–Bradshaw index (HBI). C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) were measured both at week 0 and after induction therapy (week 14), and infliximab trough levels (ITL) were measured at week 14. Bowel ultrasound was performed at week 0 and 14, BWT from the worst segment was selected for analysis. Abnormal BWT was defined has higher than 3mm in any bowel segment. Results We included 10 patients with CD (80% males; median age 29 (21–64) years). According to Montreal classification, most patients were A2 (7/10), had ileocolonic disease (L1 20%; L2 20%; L3 60%) and an inflammatory phenotype (B1 60%; B2 20% and B3 20%). Most patients were anti-TNF therapy naive (80%), and combination therapy was used in 80%. Before IFX (week 0) median HBI was 2 (IQR 1.75–5.25), CRP 1.10 mg/dl (IQR 0.65–3.50) and FC 802 μg/g (IQR 324–1336). The terminal ileum was the most affected segment identified by the USA (5/10), followed by ascending colon (2/10) descending colon (2/10) and sigmoid colon (1/10). Median BWT was 4.6 mm (IQR 3.6–6.4). After induction therapy (week 14), all patients were in clinical remission (HBI<5) except for one in whom IFX dose was increased to 10 mg/kg. Laboratory remission (CRP < 0.5 mg/dl and FC < 250 μg/g) was present in 50% of patients. US response (measured by a reduction in BWT of at least 0.5 mm) was observed in 70% of patients, with US remission (normalisation of BWT in the most affected segment) in 30%. At week 14, 70% of patient had ITL > 3 μg/ml. Median BWT at week 14 was higher in patients with ITL < 3 μg/ml (6.25 vs. 2.98 mm, p = 0.048). Conclusion The majority of our patients showed a US response (reduction in BWT) after 14 weeks of infliximab, suggesting that reduction in BWT could be an early marker of response to therapy. US evaluation after induction therapy can be a helpful tool to monitor disease activity and guide patient management in CD patients in our daily practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207