MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3001296629 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1010

Fountains and storms: the effects of AGN feedback and mergers on the evolution of the intracluster medium in the <scp>romulusc</scp> simulation

2021· article· en· W3001296629 on OpenAlexaff
Urmila Chadayammuri, Michael Tremmel, Daisuke Nagai, Arif Babul, Thomas Quinn

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsIntracluster mediumAstrophysicsStormAstronomyIntergalactic mediumMeteorologyGalaxyGalaxy clusterRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The intracluster medium (ICM) is a multiphase environment, dynamically regulated by active galactic nuclei (AGN), the motions of cluster galaxies, and mergers with other clusters or groups. AGN provide a central heating source capable of preventing runaway cooling flows and quenching star formation, but how they achieve this is still poorly understood. We investigate the effects of AGN feedback and mergers on the ICM using the high-resolution romulusc cosmological simulation of a 1014 M⊙ galaxy cluster. We demonstrate that AGN feedback regulates and quenches star formation in the brightest cluster galaxy gently, without any explosive episodes, and co-exists with a low entropy core with sub-Gyr cooling times. In contrast, the merger disrupts the ICM structure, heating the core and cutting off the supply of low-entropy, infalling gas that until then fuelled the AGN. We find that this removal of the low-entropy phase correlates with the ratio tcool / tff increasing above 30 in the core, matching observations that cooling gas is only found in clusters where this ratio is 5–30. Importantly, we find that evolution in the inner entropy profile and the ratio of cooling to free-fall time-scale are directly connected to the quenching of star formation in the BCG. This is in line with previous results from idealized simulations and confirmed here within a fully cosmological simulation for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207