Stochastic constrained linear quadratic control in a network of smart microgrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Challenges of microgrids (MGs) energy management have gained more relevance with the presence of uncertainties in power generation and local loads. These problems significantly increase when related to network of smart MGs (NSMG). To address these challenges, this study presents a stochastic constrained control problem for the optimal management of a cooperative NSMG with interconnections allowing power exchanges. In this model, each MG can exchange power locally among each other as well as with the main electric grid. The proposed control approach is based on a linear‐quadratic Gaussian problem definition for the optimal control of power flows under quadratic constraints limiting the variability of the power exchange as well as of the stored energy in each MG. The developed framework is applied to a cooperative network of four smart MGs to test and validate its effectiveness and performance. The network is connected to the main electric grid allowing power exchanges. The results demonstrate that the role of energy storage systems is undoubtedly becoming more and more relevant in the context of reacting to the stochastic behaviour of the balance between produced and consumed powers in MGs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".