MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3001725623 · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0992

Stochastic constrained linear quadratic control in a network of smart microgrids

2020· article· en· W3001725623 on OpenAlexaff
Chiara Bersani, Hanane Dagdougui, Ahmed Ouammi, Roberto Sacile

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Renewable Power Generation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadratic equationMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Challenges of microgrids (MGs) energy management have gained more relevance with the presence of uncertainties in power generation and local loads. These problems significantly increase when related to network of smart MGs (NSMG). To address these challenges, this study presents a stochastic constrained control problem for the optimal management of a cooperative NSMG with interconnections allowing power exchanges. In this model, each MG can exchange power locally among each other as well as with the main electric grid. The proposed control approach is based on a linear‐quadratic Gaussian problem definition for the optimal control of power flows under quadratic constraints limiting the variability of the power exchange as well as of the stored energy in each MG. The developed framework is applied to a cooperative network of four smart MGs to test and validate its effectiveness and performance. The network is connected to the main electric grid allowing power exchanges. The results demonstrate that the role of energy storage systems is undoubtedly becoming more and more relevant in the context of reacting to the stochastic behaviour of the balance between produced and consumed powers in MGs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Renewable Power GenerationSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207