Safety of intracameral moxifloxacin in the pediatric population: an equivalence study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate whether the safety of intracameral moxifloxacin (IC-Mox) was equivalent to subconjunctival antibiotics (SC-Abs) in pediatric lens surgery. SETTING: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive cohort study. METHODS: This equivalence study compared 95% CI in the difference between the preoperative and postoperative safety variables of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal edema, and anterior chamber (AC) inflammation in IC-Mox with SC-Abs. The zone of clinical equivalence for BCVA was set at ±0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, IOP at ±3 mm Hg, CCT at ±30 μm, and ECD at ±400 cells/mm. RESULTS: The charts of 358 patients undergoing lens-related surgeries were reviewed. Of 317 eyes (215 patients) included, 170 eyes received IC-Mox and 147 eyes had SC-Abs. The mean age was 4.9 and 5.1 years with a mean follow-up of 19 and 34.4 months (P < .001) in IC-Mox and SC-Ab groups, respectively. The 95% CIs for the change from preoperative to postoperative safety parameters between IC-Mox and SC-Abs were all in the zones of clinical equivalence (BCVA, P = 0.75; highest IOP in the first 6 weeks postoperatively, P = 0.27; IOP at the last visit, P = 0.74; CCT, P = 0.89; and ECD, P = 0.76). During the first 6 weeks postoperatively, there was no difference in corneal edema (P = .69) and AC flare (P = .4) between IC-Mox and SC-Ab groups, whereas AC cellular activity was significantly higher in the SC-Ab group (P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: IC-Mox prophylaxis in pediatric patients showed equivalent postoperative safety outcomes when compared with SC-Abs. The use of IC-Mox (250 μg) for endophthalmitis prophylaxis appears to be safe in the pediatric population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".