MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002131151 · doi:10.36019/9780813591513

Pyrrhic Progress : The History of Antibiotics in Anglo-American Food Production

2019· book· en· W3002131151 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Claas Kirchhelle

Bibliographic record

VenueOAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) · 2019
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDrug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical SciencesMitsubishi Electric Research LaboratoriesUniversity of NottinghamRoyal College of Veterinary Surgeons Charitable TrustRoyal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsNational Geographic SocietyAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaRoyal SocietyMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesBattelleUniversity of CambridgeMedical Research CouncilIowa State UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK GovernmentU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsProduction (economics)HistoryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International audience

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)Same topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207