MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002529236 · doi:10.1177/1747493019897843

Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. <i>Part One: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke;</i> 6th Edition Update 2019

2020· article· en· W3002529236 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Robert Teasell, Nancy M. Salbach, Norine Foley, Anita Mountain, Jill I. Cameron, Andrea de Jong, Nicole Acerra, Diana Bastasi, Sherri L. Carter, Joyce Fung, Mary-Lou Halabi, Jerome Iruthayarajah, Jocelyn E. Harris, Esther Kim, Andrea Noland, Sepideh Pooyania, Annie Rochette, Bridget Stack, Erin Symcox, Debbie Timpson, Suja Varghese, Sue Verrilli, Gord Gubitz, Leanne K. Casaubon, Dar Dowlatshahi, M. Patrice Lindsay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Stroke · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health NetworkUniversité de MontréalUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of AlbertaOntario Stroke NetworkMcMaster UniversityCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des LaurentidesJewish Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of OttawaMcGill UniversityVancouver Coastal HealthAlberta Health ServicesHeart and Stroke FoundationQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreDalhousie UniversitySt. John’s Health Sciences CentreWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoFoothills Medical CentreParkwood InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaYukon University
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsRehabilitationStroke (engine)MedicinePsychological interventionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeglectHemiparesisSet (abstract data type)Physical therapyNursingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sixth update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Reintegration following Stroke. Part one: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke is a comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines addressing issues surrounding impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions following stroke. Rehabilitation is a critical component of recovery, essential for helping patients to regain lost skills, relearn tasks, and regain independence. Following a stroke, many people typically require rehabilitation for persisting deficits related to hemiparesis, upper-limb dysfunction, pain, impaired balance, swallowing, and vision, neglect, and limitations with mobility, activities of daily living, and communication. This module addresses interventions related to these issues as well as the structure in which they are provided, since rehabilitation can be provided on an inpatient, outpatient, or community basis. These guidelines also recognize that rehabilitation needs of people with stroke may change over time and therefore intermittent reassessment is important. Recommendations are appropriate for use by all healthcare providers and system planners who organize and provide care to patients following stroke across a broad range of settings. Unlike the previous set of recommendations, in which pediatric stroke was included, this set of recommendations includes primarily adult rehabilitation, recognizing many of these therapies may be applicable in children. Recommendations related to community reintegration, which were previously included within this rehabilitation module, can now be found in the companion module, Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part Two: Transitions and Community Participation Following Stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations426
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of StrokeSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207