MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3002547690 · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14224-9

Extensive rewiring of the EGFR network in colorectal cancer cells expressing transforming levels of KRASG13D

2020· article· en· W3002547690 on OpenAlexafffund
Susan Kennedy, Mohamed Ali Jarboui, Sriganesh Srihari, Cinzia Raso, Kenneth Bryan, Layal Dernayka, Theodosia Charitou, Manuel Bernal Llinares, Carlos Herrera-Montávez, Aleksandar Krstić, David Matallanas, Max Kotlyar, Igor Jurišica, Jasna Ćurak, Victoria Wong, Igor Štagljar, Thierry Le Bihan, Lisa Imrie, Priyanka Pillai, Miriam A. Lynn, Erik Fasterius, Cristina Al‐Khalili Szigyarto, James Breen, Christina Kiel, Luís Serrano, Nora Rauch, Oleksii S. Rukhlenko, Boris Ν. Kholodenko, Luis F. Iglesias‐Martinez, Colm J. Ryan, Ruth Pilkington, Patrizia Cammareri, Owen J. Sansom, Steven Shave, Manfred Auer, Nicola Horn, Franziska Klose, Marius Ueffing, Karsten Boldt, David J. Lynn, Walter Kölch

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersKrembil FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionScience Foundation IrelandCancer Research UKEMBL AustraliaCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteOntario GenomicsGenome Canada
KeywordsKRASBiologyPhenotypeCancerCancer researchMutationColorectal cancerEpidermal growth factor receptorComputational biologyInteraction networkGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Protein-protein-interaction networks (PPINs) organize fundamental biological processes, but how oncogenic mutations impact these interactions and their functions at a network-level scale is poorly understood. Here, we analyze how a common oncogenic KRAS mutation (KRAS G13D ) affects PPIN structure and function of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) network in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Mapping >6000 PPIs shows that this network is extensively rewired in cells expressing transforming levels of KRAS G13D (mtKRAS). The factors driving PPIN rewiring are multifactorial including changes in protein expression and phosphorylation. Mathematical modelling also suggests that the binding dynamics of low and high affinity KRAS interactors contribute to rewiring. PPIN rewiring substantially alters the composition of protein complexes, signal flow, transcriptional regulation, and cellular phenotype. These changes are validated by targeted and global experimental analysis. Importantly, genetic alterations in the most extensively rewired PPIN nodes occur frequently in CRC and are prognostic of poor patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207