MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003014418 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.575

Targeted Conditioning with Anti-CD45 Iodine (131I) Apamistamab [Iomab-B] Leads to High Rates of Allogeneic Transplantation and Successful Engraftment in Older Patients with Active, Relapsed or Refractory (rel/ref) AML after Failure of Chemotherapy and Targeted Agents: Preliminary Midpoint Results from the Prospective, Randomized Phase 3 Sierra Trial

2020· article· en· W3003014418 on OpenAlexaff
Boglarka Gyurkocza, Rajneesh Nath, Patrick J. Stiff, Edward Agura, Mark R. Litzow, Benjamin Tomlinson, Hannah Choe, Sunil Abhyankar, Stuart Seropian, George L. Chen, Parameswaran Hari, Zaid Al‐Kadhimi, James M. Foran, Johnnie J. Orozco, Koen van Besien, Mitchell Sabloff, Partow Kebriaei, Camille N. Abboud, Moshe Levy, Hillard M. Lazarus, Sergio Giralt, Mark S. Berger, Vijay Reddy, John M. Pagel

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVenetoclaxSalvage therapyInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)TransplantationOncologyRandomizationClinical trialRandomized controlled trialSurgeryChemotherapyLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundPatients with rel/ref AML have very few options, despite novel targeted therapies (e.g. venetoclax, IDH inhibitors), other than allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to achieve a durable CR. In addition, patients ≥55 years of age cannot tolerate multiple cycles of intensive therapy trying to achieve a CR prior to transplant. Older patients are also unable to tolerate more intense myeloablative conditioning. The SIERRA trial is a prospective, randomized, phase 3 trial addressing the unmet need to improve access of older patients with active, rel/ref AML to HCT, the only potentially curative therapy available to them.MethodsPatients are randomized (1:1) to receive Iomab-B (day-12) followed by FLU/TBI and HCT, or to conventional care (CC). CC patients may receive investigator's choice of salvage therapy, including newly approved targeted agents and may proceed to standard HCT if they achieve CR. If patients do not achieve CR, the study allows cross-over (CO) to Iomab-B/HCT.ResultsPreliminary data are available from 75 (50%) patients (Table 1). Patients (median age 64) were heavily pretreated with 85% failing ≥2 induction therapies and 33% failing targeted therapies. All patients transplanted after Iomab-B engrafted. After randomization, 82% (31/38) patients in the CC arm failed salvage therapy, despite 32% (12/38) receiving targeted therapy. 73% (8/11) of the patients receiving venetoclax with HMA or LDAC did not achieve remission. Of the 31 patients, 9 were not CO transplant candidates. Of the 22 patients that crossed over for transplant, majority (91%, N=20) were able to receive Iomab-B/HCT, despite a median of 35% BM blasts. The most common reason preventing CO to transplant was disease progression. CC patients showed increased incidence of Grade 3 febrile neutropenia, compared to Iomab-B patients prior to CO or HCT (34% vs 8%). Iomab-B administration was generally well-tolerated with 1 Grade 3 and no Grade 4, infusion reaction. There were no Iomab-B-related deaths and 100-day non-relapse TRM was 3% on the Iomab-B arm (Table 1).ConclusionDespite advanced age, active disease and heavily pre-treated patients, 100% (31/31) of all patients in the Iomab-B arm who received treatment with Iomab-B were able to undergo HCT and successfully engrafted. In comparison, only 18% (7/38) of the patients on the CC arm achieved remission and underwent conventional HCT despite a high percentage receiving recently approved agents and targeted therapies. Overall, including patients crossing over to receive Iomab-B/HCT after failure of salvage therapy in the CC arm, 68% (51/75) of all patients enrolled in the trial underwent HCT after Iomab-B. These preliminary results represent significant improvements in the current rates of transplantation in this patient population. This SIERRA trial is currently enrolling (www.sierratrial.com or clinicaltrials.gov NCT02665065). Patients with rel/ref AML have very few options, despite novel targeted therapies (e.g. venetoclax, IDH inhibitors), other than allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to achieve a durable CR. In addition, patients ≥55 years of age cannot tolerate multiple cycles of intensive therapy trying to achieve a CR prior to transplant. Older patients are also unable to tolerate more intense myeloablative conditioning. The SIERRA trial is a prospective, randomized, phase 3 trial addressing the unmet need to improve access of older patients with active, rel/ref AML to HCT, the only potentially curative therapy available to them. Patients are randomized (1:1) to receive Iomab-B (day-12) followed by FLU/TBI and HCT, or to conventional care (CC). CC patients may receive investigator's choice of salvage therapy, including newly approved targeted agents and may proceed to standard HCT if they achieve CR. If patients do not achieve CR, the study allows cross-over (CO) to Iomab-B/HCT. Preliminary data are available from 75 (50%) patients (Table 1). Patients (median age 64) were heavily pretreated with 85% failing ≥2 induction therapies and 33% failing targeted therapies. All patients transplanted after Iomab-B engrafted. After randomization, 82% (31/38) patients in the CC arm failed salvage therapy, despite 32% (12/38) receiving targeted therapy. 73% (8/11) of the patients receiving venetoclax with HMA or LDAC did not achieve remission. Of the 31 patients, 9 were not CO transplant candidates. Of the 22 patients that crossed over for transplant, majority (91%, N=20) were able to receive Iomab-B/HCT, despite a median of 35% BM blasts. The most common reason preventing CO to transplant was disease progression. CC patients showed increased incidence of Grade 3 febrile neutropenia, compared to Iomab-B patients prior to CO or HCT (34% vs 8%). Iomab-B administration was generally well-tolerated with 1 Grade 3 and no Grade 4, infusion reaction. There were no Iomab-B-related deaths and 100-day non-relapse TRM was 3% on the Iomab-B arm (Table 1). Despite advanced age, active disease and heavily pre-treated patients, 100% (31/31) of all patients in the Iomab-B arm who received treatment with Iomab-B were able to undergo HCT and successfully engrafted. In comparison, only 18% (7/38) of the patients on the CC arm achieved remission and underwent conventional HCT despite a high percentage receiving recently approved agents and targeted therapies. Overall, including patients crossing over to receive Iomab-B/HCT after failure of salvage therapy in the CC arm, 68% (51/75) of all patients enrolled in the trial underwent HCT after Iomab-B. These preliminary results represent significant improvements in the current rates of transplantation in this patient population. This SIERRA trial is currently enrolling (www.sierratrial.com or clinicaltrials.gov NCT02665065).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207