MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003054600 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2020.2968814

Real-Time Processing and Quality Improvement of Synchrophasor Data

2020· article· en· W3003054600 on OpenAlexafffund
Reza Pourramezan, Houshang Karimi, Jean Mahseredjian, Mario Paolone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer sciencePhasorData stream miningData qualityMissing dataData processingPhasor measurement unitData streamReal-time computingData modelingData miningAlgorithmMetric (unit)Electric power systemPower (physics)EngineeringDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a real-time algorithm for processing and quality improvement of synchrophasor data (SD). The proposed algorithm first recovers the missing SD reported by phasor measurement units (PMUs), and performs low-rank approximation on data streams. Then, the enhanced data stream can be redirected toward various power system applications. The nonconvex matrix completion (MC) method with Schatten-q quasi-norm (l <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q</sub> ) penalty is used to recover the missing SD in realtime. Unlike most MC methods which have been developed for batch data processing, the proposed method is able to perform fast recovery of streaming data even for high reporting rates of PMU data. The low-rank approximation method is used to suppress the noise of the streaming SD, and to efficiently compress the batch data for archiving. Real-life PMU data as well as simulation data are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms. The results obtained using both real experimental and simulation SD confirm that the proposed SD processing framework significantly improves the quality of data, particularly during transient conditions and in noisy environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207