MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003124886 · doi:10.1353/cnd.2016.0029

The New Cambridge Companion to Joseph Conrad ed. by J. H. Stape

2016· article· en· W3003124886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G.W. Stephen Brodsky

Bibliographic record

VenueConradiana · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicJoseph Conrad and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriticismSkepticismPostmodernismPrologueArt historyClassicsIdeal (ethics)Privilege (computing)PhilosophyHistoryLiteratureArtLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The New Cambridge Companion to Joseph Conrad ed. by J. H. Stape G.W. Stephen Brodsky (bio) J. H. Stape, ed. The New Cambridge Companion to Joseph Conrad. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 210 pp. ISBN: 9781107610378. A brief prologue, preceding even the title page, informs us that The New Cam-bridge Companion to Joseph Conrad "provides essential guidance to varied developments in the field of Conrad Studies since the publication of the first Cambridge Companion to Joseph Conrad (1996)" (i). Its chapters engage emergent areas of interest including "canon formation, postcolonialism, gender, critical reception and adaptation […]." The present reviewer (hereinafter the editorial "we") has found it a privilege to engage with a collection so recondite and eclectic in its diverse yet complementary themes at the cutting edge of postmodern Conradian critical theory. This opening volley resumes, "This volume is the ideal starting point for students new to Conrad's work as well as scholars wishing to keep abreast of current issues" (i). While the latter claim is clearly true in the most admirable way for Conrad specialists well acquainted with Conrad's oeuvre and the body of major criticism, this reviewer is somewhat skeptical as to the former optimistic view, derived, perhaps, from the late editor's own brilliance which throughout his life made the difficult easy. As Douglas Kerr has pointed out in his essay in this volume, "Approaching Conrad Through Theory: 'The Secret Sharer,'" all criticism is based on "principles" governing approaches taken, whether overt or implicit. We have in this collection a treasury of thirteen outstanding "approach" paradigms. So, this collection is as much a study, or illustration, of today's critical theories and approaches, "burgeoning" in variety and complexity (to paraphrase Debra Rominick Baldwin [132]), as it is a consideration of Conrad and his oeuvre. Therefore, an informed reading may reveal that any but the most brilliant Con-rad tyro on first acquaintance with the canon may find such sophisticated and allusive discussions of critical modalities as textual editing, effects of serialization, facets of critical theory, and reception as daunting as it is dazzling. For the [End Page 287] Conrad specialist and even the trained generalist critic, however, this constellation of critical approaches is richly rewarding. THE EDITOR No Conrad scholar could be more fit than the late John H. Stape (1948–2016) to select and edit the contributions for this exquisite showcase of Conrad scholarship. Senior Research Fellow at St. Mary's University, Twickenham, London, he was co-general editor of The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Joseph Conrad (2008–14), also editing or co-editing directly six of its constituent works. Further, he edited the first Cambridge Companion, as well as Conrad works for Oxford World's Classics and Penguin Books and wrote his memorable biography, The Several Lives of Joseph Conrad (2007). He continued to work with unremitting resolve until illness and death ended his labor of love at the age of 68, still in the prime of his scholarly life. This review, then, is in tribute to a great Conradian. ORGANIZATION At the outset the requisite List of Contributors, with brief professional descriptions, indicative, perhaps, not only of their remarkable credentials as—without exception—superb Conrad scholars, but of the editor's international leanings: eight contributors (Francis, Glazzard, Greaney, Hand, Miller, Niland, Purcell, Simmons) are British scholars, teaching in British universities; two more (Donovan, Kerr), British-trained, teach in Sweden and Hong Kong respectively; two (Romanick-Baldwin, Mallios) are USA-trained and teach in American universities; and the editor, also a contributor, Canadian-trained, taught internationally and in Britain. This diversity of backgrounds is itself emblematic of Conrad's international appeal, crossing boundaries of nation, gender, and interest, and accounting for the broadly representative range of critical modes and focuses. An editor's Preface opens the volume proper, locating it in its context as complementary to its predecessor, for which, two decades earlier, John Stape also was editor. Showcasing "areas of concern that have opened up since," we are told, the present volume "aim(s) to take into account theoretical and hermeneutic perspectives that have come into clearer focus," through "essays that engage with the contexts—aesthetic...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConradianaSame topicJoseph Conrad and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207