MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003210651 · doi:10.5802/smai-jcm.54

Uniform and pointwise shape preserving approximation (SPA) by algebraic polynomials: an update

2020· article· en· W3003210651 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMAI Journal of Computational Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPointwiseDegree (music)MathematicsAlgebraic numberApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is not surprising that one should expect that the degree of constrained (shape preserving) approximation be worse than the degree of unconstrained approximation. However, it turns out that, in certain cases, these degrees are the same. The main purpose of this paper is to provide an update to our 2011 survey paper. In particular, we discuss recent uniform estimates in comonotone approximation, mention recent developments and state several open problems in the (co)convex case, and reiterate that co- <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:math> -monotone approximation with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is completely different from comonotone and coconvex cases. Additionally, we show that, for each function <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> </mml:math> from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , the set of all monotone functions on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and every <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , we have <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> <mml:mrow> <mml:munder> <mml:mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">lim sup</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>∞</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:munder> <mml:mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">inf</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℙ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∩</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mfenced separators="" open="∥" close="∥"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mfrac> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>≤</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:munder> <mml:mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">lim sup</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>→</mml:mo> <mml:mi>∞</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:munder> <mml:mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">inf</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∈</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℙ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:munder> <mml:mfenced separators="" open="∥" close="∥"> <mml:mfrac> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mfrac> </mml:mfenced> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> where <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ℙ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> denotes the set of algebraic polynomials of degree <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ϕ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:msqrt> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it