MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003211021 · doi:10.1159/000505299

Reliability of Home Nocturnal Oximetry in the Diagnosis of Overlap Syndrome in COPD

2020· article· en· W3003211021 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiration · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDPolysomnographyHypoxemiaPulse oximetryApneaSleep apneaInternal medicineObstructive sleep apneaOxygen saturationCardiologyAnesthesiaOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and sleep apnea are common conditions and often coexist. The proper diagnosis of sleep apnea may affect the management and outcome of patients with COPD. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of home nocturnal oximetry to distinguish between nocturnal oxygen desaturation related to COPD alone or to sleep apnea in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD who have significant nocturnal hypoxemia with cyclical changes in saturation. METHODS: This study involved a comparison of home nocturnal oximetry and laboratory-based polysomnography (PSG) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD considered for inclusion in a trial of nocturnal oxygen therapy. All of the patients had significant nocturnal oxygen desaturation (defined as ≥30% of the recording time with a transcutaneous arterial oxygen saturation <90%) with cyclical changes in saturation suggestive of sleep apnea. RESULTS: PSG was obtained in 90 patients; 45 patients (mean age = 68 years, SD = 8; 71% men; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50.6% predicted value, SD = 18.6%; data from 41 patients) fulfilled the criteria for sleep apnea (mean apnea-hypopnea index = 32.6 events/h, SD = 19.9) and 45 patients (mean age = 69 years, SD = 8; 87% men; mean FEV1 predicted value 44.6%, SD = 15%) did not (mean apnea-hypopnea index = 5.5 events/h, SD = 3.8). None of the patients' characteristics (including demographic, anthropometric, and physiologic measures) predicted the diagnosis of sleep apnea according to PSG results. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of sleep apnea in patients with moderate to severe COPD cannot rely on nocturnal oximetry alone, even when typical cyclical changes in saturation are seen on oximetry tracing. When suspecting an overlap syndrome, a full-night, in-laboratory PSG should be obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it