THE JUSTIFICATION ON THE TIME OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE KURGAN BESH-OBA IV / 3 AKKAI (BELOGORSKY) BURNED BOTTLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the justification of the opinion on the construction in the second and third quarters of the 4th cent. BC. Mound 3, the topographic group of the royal mound IV, located on the town of Besh-Oba in the Piedmont Crimea. The Besh Oba IV / 3 burial mound was a part of Besh Oba IV burial mound, which was built in the end of the second to the third quarter of the 4th cent. BC. Analysis of the funeral equipment from the floor of the burial chamber in the crypt of the mound 3, allows to synchronize the royal burial mound IV and the burial mound 3. It makes us face the fact that the inlet «collective» burials in the burial chamber of the burial mound crypt 3, belong to a later time than the crypt and date back mainly as 2nd cent. BC. This conclusion confirms the correctness of the dating of the Besh-Ob IV group of burial mounds, which was previously suggested by S. G. Koltukhov, and S.V. Polin. Consequently, it receives an additional confirmation of the opinion that the entire aristocratic Scythian burial mound, located on the mountains of Ak-Kaya and Besh-Ob, can be related to the second and third quarters of the 4th cent. BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".