Comparison of elapegademase and pegademase in ADA-deficient patients and mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The absence of adenosine deaminase (ADA) causes severe combined immune deficiency (SCID), which has been treated with PEGylated bovine-extracted ADA (ADAGEN). ADAGEN was recently replaced by a PEGylated recombinant bovine ADA, expressed in Escherichia coli (elapegademase, ELA-ADA). Limited information on ELA-ADA is available. ADA enzymatic activity of ELA-ADA and ADAGEN was assessed in vitro at diverse dilutions. ADA activity and immune reconstitution in an ADA-SCID patient treated with ELA-ADA were compared with age-matched patients previously treated with ADAGEN. ADA activity and thymus reconstitution were evaluated in ADA-deficient mice following ELA-ADA or ADAGEN administered from 7 days postpartum. In vitro, ADA activity of ELA-ADA and ADAGEN were similar at all dilutions. In an ADA-SCID patient, ELA-ADA treatment led to a marked increase in trough plasma ADA activity, which was 20% higher than in a patient previously treated with ADAGEN. A marked increase in T cell numbers and generation of naive T cells was evident following 3 months of ELA-ADA treatment, while T cell numbers increased following 4 months in 3 patients previously treated with ADAGEN. T cell proliferations stimulation normalized and thymus shadow became evident following ELA-ADA treatment. ADA activity was significantly increased in the blood of ADA-deficient mice following ELA-ADA compared to ADAGEN, while both treatments improved the mice weights, the weight, number of cells in their thymus and thymocyte subpopulations. ELA-ADA has similar in- vitro and possibly better in-vivo activity than ADAGEN. Future studies will determine whether ELA-ADA results in improved long-term immune reconstitution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".