MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003247616 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.10567

Path Query Data Structures in Practice

2020· preprint· en· W3003247616 on OpenAlexaff
Meng He, Serikzhan Kazi

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceData structurePath (computing)Tree traversalPointer (user interface)Theoretical computer scienceAlgorithmData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We perform experimental studies on data structures that answer path median, path counting, and path reporting queries in weighted trees. These query problems generalize the well-known range median query problem in arrays, as well as the $2d$ orthogonal range counting and reporting problems in planar point sets, to tree structured data. We propose practical realizations of the latest theoretical results on path queries. Our data structures, which use tree extraction, heavy-path decomposition and wavelet trees, are implemented in both succinct and pointer-based form. Our succinct data structures are further specialized to be plain or entropy-compressed. Through experiments on large sets, we show that succinct data structures for path queries may present a viable alternative to standard pointer-based realizations, in practical scenarios. Compared to na{ï}ve approaches that compute the answer by explicit traversal of the query path, our succinct data structures are several times faster in path median queries and perform comparably in path counting and path reporting queries, while being several times more space-efficient. Plain pointer-based realizations of our data structures, requiring a few times more space than the na{ï}ve ones, yield up to $100$-times speed-up over them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0050.016
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.091 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207