EL USO DE LOS CONECTORES EN IDIOMA FRANCÉS EN LA LICENCIATURA EN TURISMO / THE USE OF FRENCH CONNECTORS AT TOURISM DEGREE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presente investigacion se realizo tomando como poblacion al quinto ano de la carrera Licenciatura en Turismo de la Universidad de Ciego de Avila Maximo Gomez Baez, tuvo como objetivo el de perfeccionar el proceso de ensenanza-aprendizaje del idioma frances. La experiencia de la practica pedagogica y la observacion directa al proceso evidencio dificultades en los estudiantes en la expresion oral, una de las causas identificadas de esta problematica esta relacionada con el pobre uso de los conectores cuya funcion consiste en relacionar sintactica y semanticamente dos signos (frases, palabras, clausulas, oraciones). Una revision realizada al programa de la asignatura Frances I y al metodo utilizado Vacances cubaines arrojo que el trabajo con los conectores es de forma general limitado. Los empleados son utilizados una y otra vez provocando pobreza en la comunicacion y dificultades en la fluidez del idioma. Para mejorar en ese aspecto se incremento el numero de los conectores a utilizar en clase y se crecio no solo en cantidad y variedad, sino tambien que se logro un mayor desarrollo en la habilidad de la expresion oral
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".