MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003315194 · doi:10.3917/annor.731.0161

Les pratiques et les espaces funéraires antiques en Normandie occidentale : premiers résultats

2023· article· fr· W3003315194 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Brunet, Laurent Paez-Rezende, Laurence Jeanne, Erwan Nivez, Aurélien Piolot, Guy Leclerc, Vincent Carpentier, Karine Chanson, Annabelle Cocollos, Dominique Corde, Caroline Duclos, Romuald Ferrette, David Flotté, Laurette Fromentin, David Giazzon, Magali Heppe, Benjamin Hérard, Vincent Hincker, Ivan Jahier, Aurore Lacroix, Gaël Lėon, Isabelle Le Goff, Myriam Le Puil-Texier, Marc-Antoine Thierry, Didier Paillard, Grégory Schütz, Aminte Thomann, Cécile Torrubia Besnard

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Normandie · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Historical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une première synthèse sur le funéraire antique en Normandie occidentale établie à partir d’un corpus de 29 sites retenus parmi une documentation très dense et de qualité inégale. La plupart sont inédits, certains ont été partiellement publiés. Ce corpus illustre un large panel des pratiques funéraires identifiées au niveau régional et couvre une vaste plage chronologique allant du i er siècle avant notre ère au v e siècle. La crémation des corps domine largement le paysage funéraire bas normand depuis la Conquête et durant tout le Haut-Empire. Cette pratique cède peu à peu la place à celle de l’inhumation qui devient, à son tour, majoritaire dans le courant du iii e siècle. Cependant, de nombreux sites prouvent que ces deux rites ont longtemps coexisté. Au-delà de ces considérations, les sites funéraires antiques de Normandie occidentale reflètent une variété d’occupations depuis la tombe isolée au mausolée familial, en passant par la nécropole communautaire. Seules les nécropoles urbaines demeurent à ce jour non documentées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de NormandieSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207