Proteomic Analysis of Complement Proteins in Membranous Nephropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in Caucasian adults. Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R)- and exostosin 1 (EXT1)/exostosin 2 (EXT2)-associated MN represent the most common primary and secondary forms of MN. The complement profile using a proteomics approach has not been studied in these 2 common forms of MN. METHODS: = 21), and 11 control cases (time 0 transplant biopsies). RESULTS: MS/MS identified high total spectral counts for PLA2R and EXT1/EXT2 in corresponding cases of PLA2R- and EXT1/EXT2-positive MN. Both PLA2R- and EXT1/EXT2-associated MN had high spectral counts of complement proteins C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, and C9. Complement protein C1 was present in low spectral counts in EXT1/EXT2-associated MN. Regulators of complement activation that were detected in MN included higher spectral counts of FH, FHR-1, FHR-5, clusterin, vitronectin and lower spectral counts of FHR-3, FHR-4, and CD59. Low spectral counts of FB and properdin, key components of the alternative pathway, also were detected. IgG4 and IgG1 were the most abundant IgG subclasses in PLA2R- and EXT1/EXT2-associated MN. Lower spectral counts for C3, C4, and C5 were detected in control cases when compared with MN. CONCLUSION: Significant complement activation is present in MN as evidenced by large spectral counts of complement proteins from C3- and C4-based pathways, including regulatory proteins of complement pathways. These data suggest that anticomplement drugs may be effective in treatment for MN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".