MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003636129 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2019.2950133

Fluidically Reconfigurable MIMO Antenna With Pattern Diversity for Sub-6-GHz 5G Relay Node Applications

2020· article· en· W3003636129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAntenna (radio)MIMOTopology (electrical circuits)Node (physics)Channel (broadcasting)PhysicsMathematicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A four-element frequency reconfigurable and pattern diverse multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) antenna array for fifth-generation relay node applications is presented to operate in LTE bands 42 (3400–3600 MHz), 43 (3600–3800 MHz), and 46 (5150–5925 MHz). A planar microstrip line-fed monopole antenna is utilized as the MIMO element. The antenna relies on fluidic reconfiguration mechanism to either serve LTE bands 42/43 or 46. It incorporates a substrate milled channel beneath each monopole arm to hold distilled water. The water in the channel perturbs the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -field distribution in the vicinity of the antenna arm and modifies the effective permittivity of the dielectric medium. To realize pattern diversity, adjacent elements are placed orthogonal to each other. Measured prototype exhibits a total active reflection coefficient <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$|{\text{TARC}}|$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$|S_{11} |\leq -10$ </tex-math></inline-formula> dB for the high band when the channel is vacant (case 1) and the low band when filled with water (case 2), while minimum isolation is above 19.6 dB. The peak measured gain is ~4.6 and ~2.8 dBi, while the worst case envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) is ~0.004 and ~0.016 for cases 1 and 2, respectively. It measures 82.4 <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\times$ </tex-math></inline-formula> 82.4 mm2 and was fabricated on a 1.52-mm-thick substrate of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\epsilon_{r}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> = 3.55.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it