MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003666512 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970988

Experimental Testing of a Real-Time Implementation of a PMU-Based Wide-Area Damping Control System

2020· article· en· W3003666512 on OpenAlexaff
Eldrich Rebello, Luigi Vanfretti, Muhammad Shoaib Almas

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsWind Energy Institute of Canada
FundersNordic Energy ResearchStrongU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceControl (management)Control systemControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modern power grid is being used under operating conditions of increasing stress, giving rise to grid stability issues. One of these stability issues is the phenomenon of inter-area oscillations. Simulations have demonstrated the advantages of Wide-area Measurement Signals (WAMS)-based Oscillation Damping Controls in achieving improved electromechanical mode damping compared to traditional, local signal-based Power System Stabilizers (PSS). This work takes an existing Phasor-based oscillation damping (POD) algorithm and uses it to implement a proof-of-concept, wide-area, real-time controller on National Instruments hardware. The developed prototype is tested in a real-time Hardware-in-the-loop setup (RT-HIL) using OPAL-RT's eMEGASIM real-time simulation platform and synchrophasor data from actual Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs). The prototype and experiments provide insight into the feasibility and real-world limitations of wide-area controls. Further, it is demonstrated how the proposed control architecture has applications independent of the controlled power system device. Challenges faced, the solutions implemented together with the present prototype's limitations are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207