Revised biostratigraphic and thermal alteration interpretations for the Paleozoic of the Hopedale Basin, offshore Labrador, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Paleozoic rocks occur in seven wells in the Hopedale Basin, offshore Labrador (Hopedale E-33, South Hopedale L-39, Tyrk P-100, Gudrid H-55, Roberval K-92, Indian Harbour M-52, and Freydis B-87), where they represent erosional remnants primarily associated with Cretaceous syn-rift half grabens. Previous palynological studies have reported a range of ages for the Paleozoic in these wells, including Ordovician, Devonian, Carboniferous, and undifferentiated Paleozoic. Palynological analyses in the present study confirm that recovery is limited, primarily due to the predominance of lithologies that hinder palynomorph preservation, specifically dolostones. Palynomorphs (predominantly acritarchs and chitinozoans) have been analyzed from new and archived samples from the seven wells and have, for the first time, produced consistent age determinations for the Paleozoic strata in all wells: palynomorph assemblages considered in place indicate a Middle to Late Ordovician age. Thermal maturity was determined from Ordovician acritarchs and leiospheres observed in the Gudrid H-55, Roberval K-92, Indian Harbour M-52, and Freydis B-87 wells, with thermal alteration indices (TAI) ranging from approximately 5+ to 6+ (dry gas). Carboniferous miospores are present from Paleozoic strata in the southern Hopedale Basin wells, where their TAI values range from 3+ to 4. These miospores are interpreted as contaminants introduced into the samples via cavings or as drilling mud contamination. The data presented here provides new biostratigraphic constraints for the Paleozoic of the Hopedale Basin (Middle to Late Ordovician), facilitates the correlation of the Paleozoic intervals in these wells, and enables the consideration of Labrador margin Lower Paleozoic strata in regional studies as well as in paleogeographic and paleoenvironmental reconstructions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".