ALSBMF: Predicting lncRNA-Disease Associations by Alternating Least Squares Based on Matrix Factorization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, it has been increasingly clear that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are able to regulate their target genes at multi-levels, including transcriptional level, translational level, etc and play key regulatory roles in many important biological processes, such as cell differentiation, chromatin remodeling and more. Inferring potential lncRNA-disease associations is essential to reveal the secrets behind diseases, develop novel drugs, and optimize personalized treatments. However, biological experiments to validate lncRNA-disease associations are very time-consuming and costly. Thus, it is critical to develop effective computational models. In this study, we have proposed a method by alternating least squares based on matrix factorization to predict lncRNA-disease associations, referred to as ALSBMF. ALSBMF first decomposes the known lncRNA-disease correlation matrix into two characteristic matrices, then defines the optimization function using disease semantic similarity, lncRNA functional similarity and known lncRNA-disease associations and solves two optimal feature matrices by least squares method. The two optimal feature matrices are finally multiplied to reconstruct the scoring matrix, filling the missing values of the original matrix to predict lncRNA-disease associations. Compared to existing methods, ALSBMF has the same advantages as BPLLDA. It does not require negative samples and can predict associations related to novel lncRNAs or novel diseases. In addition, this study performs leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and five-fold cross-validation to evaluate the prediction performance of ALSBMF. The AUCs are 0.9501 and 0.9215, respectively, which are better than the existing methods. Furthermore colon cancer, kidney cancer, and liver cancer are selected as case studies. The predicted top three colon cancer, kidney cancer, and liver cancer-related lncRNAs were validated in the latest LncRNADisease database and related literature. In order to test the ability of ALSBMF to predict novel disease-associated lncRNAs and new lncRNA-associated diseases, all known associations of diseases and lncRNAs were eliminated, the predicted top five breast cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma cancer-related lncRNAs and top five H19, MALAT1 lncRNA-related cancers were validated in PubMed and dbSNP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".