MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004006999 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106144

Modelling the effect of directional spatial ecological processes for a river network in Northern Italy

2020· article· en· W3004006999 on OpenAlexaff
Alessio Pollice, Giovanna Jona Lasinio, Mattias Gaglio, F. Guillaume Blanchet, Elisa Anna Fano

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
KeywordsRiver ecosystemBenthic zoneEcologyEnvironmental scienceEcosystemCommunity structureCanonical correspondence analysisSpecies distributionHabitatBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The River Continuum Concept (RCC) and the Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis (RES) are two different theories proposed by river ecologists to describe the response of biotic communities to environmental variability. River network directional patterns are conveniently described by asymmetric eigenvector maps, an eigenfunction-based spatial filtering method specifically proposed for situations where a hypothesized directional spatial process influences the species distribution. In this work asymmetric eigenvector maps are used in conjunction with canonical redundancy analysis and variation partitioning analysis to describe the distribution of macroinvertebrate communities of a river system in Northern Italy and to test the link between the river theories and the available data. Benthic macrofauna data were collected during the summer of 2009–2013 in 16 rivers, for a total of 283 replicates. We investigate the effects of some measured environmental factors on the benthic macrofauna community, accounting for directional effects intrinsic to the river network structure. The proposed protocol allows to highlight and discuss some of the features relevant to the two river theories. According to the RCC theory, altitude and temperature were relevant factors affecting the macrozoobenthic community, together with the distance from the spring and water depth. Environmental factors representing local and lateral dimensions were less relevant for explaining the variability of the community composition. Nonetheless a role of the surrounding land use was also found, suggesting the presence of lateral effects due to human activities. Overall, the results demonstrated that RCC is a reliable model to describe the distribution of macrobenthic communities in river networks. In socio-ecological systems, the local and lateral dimensions postulated by the RES theory could be mainly related to surrounding land use and naturalness degree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological IndicatorsSame topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyFrench-language works237,207